Thursday, January 8, 2009

Stop the Zionist terror unleashed on the people of Gaza!


Statement of the Christian Rakovsky Balkan Socialist Center

Stop the Zionist terror unleashed on the people of Gaza!

Israeli troops out of Gaza immediately!

Victory to the Palestinian Resistance!

Down with the Zionist state!

For a free, united, secular, socialist Republic in the entire historic territory of Palestine embracing the Arabs and the Jews!

The murderous war of extermination unleashed by Israel on the people of Gaza is testimony to the vicious nature of the Zionist state--if that kind of testimony was ever needed. Hypocritically presented as an attempt to stop the shelling of southern Israel with missiles and mortars by Hamas militants, the assault is in effect an all out endeavour to intimidate the civilian population of Gaza in order to eventually bring down the Hamas government elected through universal suffrage in 2005. So far more than 660 (up to now, January 7, 2009)Palestinians, among whom many children, elderly and non-combatant women, have lost their lives as a result of Israeli bombing and more than 3000 have been injured. The list of some of the buildings targeted by Israeli war planes is also telling: the prime minister's office and several ministries, other governmental buildings, the Islamic University, and, most importantly many mosques, six to date. None of these can reasonably be argued to belong to Hamas; they are all the common patrimony of the Palestinian people, a people impoverished by decades of ruthless colonial oppression. The ground war now targets whole cities--Beit Lahiya, Beit Hanun, Jabaliya, as well as Gaza City, the capital of the Strip. Even Rafah in the south bordering Egypt is being heavily pounded by air strikes targeting the web of tunnels that serve for provisions coming into Gaza--a vital source of supplies for the population of Gaza given the vicious economic blockade being implemented by Israel for a long time now. It is the whole population of Gaza, 1.4 million souls, including children, the elderly, women and civilians in general, that is suffering immensely as a result of this ferocious offensive by the Zionist state on the densest population settlement on earth.

A war for “regime change”

In attacking Gaza, Israel is following in the footsteps of its “big brother”, i.e. US imperialism, replicating the policies pursued by the latter against Saddam's Iraq. Having received the mandate of the people of Gaza in landslide elections in 2005, Hamas has been in power in the territory ever since. The fact that Hamas does not recognise the legitimacy of the Zionist state, added to its refusal to comply, in contrast to al Fatah under the rule of Mahmoud Abbas and its stooges in the so-called Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, with the dictates of the so-called “Oslo peace process” has led Israel to adopt an outright hostile policy to the government in Gaza elected freely by the people of the territory. The complete blockade of the territory for a long time now was very much a replica of the embargo staged on Iraq in the 1990s by the US and the EU, with the seal of approval of the United Nations, that parliament of imperialist bandits, an embargo that cost the lives of nearly one million Iraqi citizens, including around 500 thousand children. Gaza, for its part, has gone with two or three hours of power daily and a meagre ration of food for a very long time now. As a result, today, under the Israeli offensive, the population has to survive without electricity, without water, without a functioning telephone network and with a dire shortage of food--and all this in terribly cold weather.

The war declared on the territory is itself very clearly a war for “regime change”. Apart from dismantling a part of the military power of Hamas, the Zionist state aims to terrorise the civilian population of Gaza in order to lay the basis for the fall of the government and its transfer to “safer” hands. Naturally, all kinds of public relations ploys are being used to mask this objective. A top level Israeli official reveals, under condition of anonymity, that during a war cabinet meeting, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has said very clearly that “the objective is not to topple the government”. And this crap, very visibly a manoeuvre of public relations, is spread far and wide by the international media! Unfortunately for Israel and its acolytes, deputy prime minister Chaim Ramon blundered early on and has gone on record for having declared that “the aim of the operation is to bring down the regime” (French daily Le Monde). This is definitely where truth lies: the political content of the war is the attempt by Israel to bring down the Hamas government in Gaza and replace it with a more docile government that will bend to its diktat.

The new war of aggression of Israel against the Palestinian people in Gaza is not only a sign of the barbarity but also a symptom of the deep crisis of Zionism itself. After its humiliating defeat in 2006 at the hands of the Hezbollah militia, the Zionist regime has plunged in a deep crisis affecting all the military, intelligence and political Israeli establishment while the head of the State of Israel, the head of the Kadima-Labor Coalition government and the head of the army of invasion in Lebanon had to resign under an avalanche of scandals destroying what was left of authority to these embodiments of the Zionist institutions. Over this shambles emerged Netanyahu of the right wing Likud (which includes now an openly racist-fascist wing) as the probable winner in the coming Israeli elections in February 10, 2009. Kadima’s leader and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Labor’s leader and Minister of Defence Ehud Barak have planned their aggression to Gaza in a timing that helps them to use war hysteria to advance their electoral chances (and apparently, in this cynical and criminal exchange of corpses with votes they succeeded according to the polls).

But the attempt by the war in Gaza to re-stabilize the Zionist State after the Lebanese 2006 debacle and to re-elect a Kadima-Labor Coalition to continue the fraud of a “dialogue” with the puppet Abbas in Ramallah while eliminating Hamas (including a new Hamas electoral victory) is condemned to fail. Credibility to Israel’s deterrent power could be further damaged, particularly “if they enter the deadly labyrinth of Gaza City and its refugee camps, as they were suckered into the treacherous ravines of South Lebanon”( Financial Times, January 4, 2009) Gideon Rachman, a columnist of the Financial Times characterises the aggression as “Israel’s self-defeating Gaza offensive” ( FT January 5, 2009).

The war in Gaza destabilizes further an already chaotic Middle East and produces new explosive problems for the Zionist regime and its allies in the West and in the Arab world in the middle of the worst world capitalist crisis in history.

Universal complicity

The whole of the so-called “international community” has a share in the responsibility regarding the death of hundreds and the untold misery of the entire population of Gaza. The international media are adamant on attributing the blame on the missiles and mortars fired by Hamas into Israel, thus balancing out the occasional death of an Israeli citizen every so many months against the death of more than 660 Palestinians (and still counting!) within 10 days! The talk on the “disproportionate use of force”, rampant in the media, is still another smokescreen that justifies, rather then condemns, the murderous acts committed by Israeli forces, implying as it does that, in itself, the onslaught is justified, but that Israel should be a bit more restrained. The question that naturally arises is how many Palestinian casualties would make the Israeli assault more “civilised” and “proportionate”?
United States imperialism must surely have been consulted by Israel before the decision to attack was made. In any event, the Bush Administration is now standing squarely behind the massacre of the Palestinian population. It has even blocked the meek UN Security Council draft resolution on the issue, lest this should pave the way for a ceasefire and get in the way of Israel in achieving its aims. The EU, as represented by its present official Czech presidency, has come out unequivocally on the side of Israel, as has the German government. Sarkozy, in a familiar show of French and personal illusion de grandeur, is posturing for a ceasefire, making it clear, nonetheless, that what is needed is a “durable ceasefire”, i.e. one that has tamed Hamas into accepting Israeli conditions.
The Security Council staged a show on the 12th day of the massacre, trying to make the peoples of the world believe that it is really concerned about what is going on. The live broadcasting of the speeches of Mahmud Abbas and the UN representative of Israel by international network channels was part of the farce being played out. Abbas, a traitor to the Palestinian cause, cannot, et this point, in any manner be considered to be providing the viewpoint of the people of Gaza (or of the Palestinian people at large, for that matter—he is now, incidentally, jockeying to extend his mandate, which expires at the end of this month of January.)
Russia manoeuvres between imperialism and its local would be allies, particularly Syria. It refused to take a stand in defense of the embattled Palestinian people. To show its resurgent geopolitical role, it moved in the region in crisis two important ships of the Russian Fleet, a missile destroyer escorting Russia’s only air carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov”, which has anchored offshore the southern coast of Turkey.
The reactionary Arab states, from medieval Saudi Arabia and the Gulf sheikhdoms to the more “modern” dictatorships such as Egypt and Jordan have not yet lifted a finger in order to help their Palestinian brothers and sisters. Livni had announced Israel’s coming war while she was on official visit in Egypt, and Mubarak’s regime not only keeps the Egyptian borders with Gaza closed but also its troops fired against the Palestinians assisting Zionist fire. As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed on January 5 Hosni Mubarak had told European officials that Hamas must not be allowed to win the conflict in the Gaza Strip . No wonder then that even Condoleezza Rice “commends” the resolution proposed by Egypt concerning a diplomatic solution to the war: Mubarek’s stand can only play into the hands of Israel. The Arab League has not even made the most formal hypocritical noise of protest in the face of the Israeli atrocities. All these reactionary states are tied hand and feet by their utter servility to US imperialism, depending as they do on its support for their survival. They are also dead scared by the prospect of a Palestinian victory against Zionism, since this would trigger a massive revolt against their hold on power.
Closer to home, Greece and Turkey bear responsibility for the atrocities committed by Israel as well. Both countries have military pacts and close military and intelligence cooperation with Israel A few months ago, Israel-Greek military exercises took place in Crete having as a declared target Iran. The US military bases in Crete and other US/NATO facilities in Greece, as well as in Turkey and the British bases in Cyprus are crucial for any imperialist intervention in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East. The Karamanlis right wing government, which still faces the upheaval from the December 2008 popular revolt, shares all the hypocrisy of the dominant European Union powers; it “regrets” the Israeli invasion and condemns the “violence” of…Hamas.

The hypocrisy of the semi-Islamist government of Turkey has reached disgusting proportions. Prime Minister Erdoğan's first reaction to Israel's onslaught was: “This is an affront on our respectability”, a reaction that would make him the laughing stock of the world, since his “respectability” pales into insignificance when compared to the death of a single Palestinian child. However, there also resides in this comment the tragedy of a politician reared in the anti-Semitic environment of the Islamist milieu, where the whole world is considered to be ruled through a Jewish conspiracy, the same politician now finding himself exposed as a friend of Zionism against the Palestinian people. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had visited Erdoğan barely four days before the air bombardment began and, given the close collaboration between the two countries, the question is rightly being asked whether Olmert let Erdoğan in on his plans to attack Gaza, an extremely embarrassing situation for the latter. Having tried to pursue a policy of “regional power” mediating between contending forces in the Middle East and the Caucasus (the most ridiculous instance being the attempt to establish a non-aggression pact between Caucasian states and Russia in the aftermath of the Russian-Georgian war last summer), Erdoğan has now visited Damascus and Amman in order to promote détente, whereas any policy that does not confront the brutal Israeli aggression head on really plays into the hands of the aggressor. Turkey has become, in the course of the last two decades, a quasi-strategic ally of Israel, holding common war games with the Zionist state, allowing Israeli pilots to train in Turkish airspace, signing a multiplicity of military agreements, and entrusting many different military renovation projects to the Israeli military-industrial complex.

Freudian slip: who is Barack Obama monitored” by?

Since his victory in the US presidential elections, Barack Obama has been the darling of the reformist and pacifist wing of the antiwar movement in the United States and the West in general. The Stop the War Coalition of Britain (sister organization of the organization with the same name in Greece and other countries) made its nature clear for all to see by declaring that it was “delighted” to see Obama elected. For days and weeks after Obama's victory, the democratising and liberal left worldwide clamoured to convince ordinary people that Obama was the hope of all, both in the economic area and regarding US foreign policy, including the question of war. Given Obama's own statements on the different aspects of foreign policy and his choice of personnel (e.g. his promise of a “surge” in Afghanistan, his threat of bombing Pakistan, something even George W. Bush has been doing under cover, his all too clear allegiance to Israel, his pick of Joseph Biden, a resolute friend of Zionism, as running mate, his prevarications on the question of withdrawal of troops from Iraq late in the campaign, his choice of Emmanuel Rahm, a notorious Zionist, as White House Chief of Staff, and the final nail in the coffin of illusions, the nomination of Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State), the ingenuous deception of the reformists and the pacifists can only be termed shameless.

It is this very president-elect, the peace-lover championed by the reformists and the pacifists the world round, who carefully kept his mouth firmly shut for the first ten days during the tragedy being played out in Gaza! And when he opened it, he was only able to mumble “concerns” about the situation and pontificate on how “engaged” he would be once he takes office, leading all mainstream commentators to agree that what he said amounted to nothing. Most telling in his words was not what he wanted to say, but something he did not wish to say but escaped his mouth! Having started out one of his sentences as “I’m being fully briefed on the events”, he finished it by adding “and monitored”, then hastening to correct himself by saying “monitoring the situation”. The original utterance, that Barack Obama is being monitored, reveals his real “concern”. Taking over the presidency in the midst of the worst economic crisis world capitalism has experienced since the 1930s, haunted already by scandals arising within the Democratic establishment, i.e. the sale of the Senate seat in Illinois and the Mexican connection of Bill Richardson, the would-be Commerce Secretary, Obama is extremely concerned not to alienate the Zionist establishment so powerful in the United States even before he has been inaugurated president. He is thus painfully aware that he is being closely “monitored” by this powerful establishment and, most immediately, by his Vice-President and his Chief of Staff!

In effect, Israel has done Obama a great favour by starting its war of aggression three weeks before the inauguration of the president-elect. In the (improbable) case where the Israeli war attains its objectives or in the (more probable) case where an international intervention establishes, under the threat of extermination for the Gazan population, a new status quo by the 20th of January, Obama will have been exonerated of the murder of hundreds or even thousands of Palestinians in the eyes of a large constituency as he is taking over the presidency. Not in our eyes! Every day that passes by without a clear protest by Obama adds to his exposition as a shameless supporter of the massacre and a reliable friend of Zionism!

The shameful capitulation of Mahmoud Abbas

That the process of the integration of the leadership of Al Fatah and, consequently, of the PLO into the imperialist order of things as a result of the so-called “Oslo peace process” has reached the stage of the putrescence of this leadership has been laid bare in the reaction of Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian Authority, to the Israeli aggression on Gaza. Having condemned both Israel and Hamas on the first days of the air bombardment, Abbas had to wait for a week and for the launching of a ground war by Israel to speak of a “brutal aggression” by the latter. And these are only words! While his Palestinian brethren are being decimated in Gaza, Abbas, supposedly the President also of the 1.4 million Palestinians living there has not lifted a finger so much as to organise a massive demonstration, such as the ones organised by Hezbollah in Beirut. No doubt, the real duty of Abbas, Al Fatah and the PLO is to fight the Israeli army guns in hand, in order to broaden the front on which the Zionist state has to fight. But even the demonstrations in Ramallah had to be organised by Hamas itself!

The left-wing forces in the PLO, first and foremost the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, but also living forces within Al Fatah itself, should, without delay, make a balance sheet of the record of Abbas and the PLO and break with the shameless attitude of collaboration with imperialism and Zionism adopted by the present leadership. The friends of the Palestinian people must speak the truth to its organisations and not hide it under diplomatic manoeuvres. The way forward for the Palestinian revolution and the liberation of this people with a unique destiny lies in the break from the pro-imperialist and pro-Zionist leadership of the moment. Unless this path is taken, Hamas will be the centre of attraction for those Palestinians who persevere in the fight against Zionism.

For international solidarity with the people of Gaza! For a free Palestine!

The beginning of the 21st century has seen a massive drift between the governments and the peoples of the world on the question of war and peace. Striking a chord reminiscent of the antiwar movement against the aggression on Iraq, and in particular of the more than ten million people who marched on 15 February 2003 on all continents, the peoples of the world, from Indonesia in the east to Chile and Peru in the Western hemisphere, have taken to the streets to protest the Israeli atrocities in Gaza. The peoples of the Arab Middle East have painted a striking contrast with their rulers. The people of Turkey have come out time and again to show solidarity with the Palestinians. Most importantly, the Greek people, in the context of a massive revolt that has now lasted for a month, have not neglected solidarity with the wretched of the earth that the Gazan people are. This movement should be consolidated and widened to embrace ever broader layers of the population of each country until every government realises that it has to pay a high price to support the butchers in power in Jerusalem.

Despite the technological and manpower superiority of the Israeli army over the military forces of Hamas, an Israeli victory against the people of Gaza is far from a foregone conclusion. Only two years have gone by since, in the summer of 2006, the Hezbollah of Lebanon inflicted an embarrassing defeat militarily and politically on the supposedly invincible armed forces of Israel. The Palestinian people have in the past proved their heroic dedication to the cause of their oppressed nation. Israel's exit from Gaza will certainly not be as easy as its entry.

The colonialist, racist and fundamentalist Zionist state of Israel embodies the expropriation of all the national rights of the Palestinian people, including, the rightful demand of the Palestinians refugees to return to their homeland. With Israel as a bastion, imperialism will continue to wield a weapon that serves to force the peoples of the region to submit to its dictates As Zionism plunges in crisis, it escalates the oppression and extermination of Palestinians in all occupied Palestine. The fallacy of a “two-state solution” with a Palestinian statelet composed two or more Bantustans has definitely collapsed. Its failure is obvious from the Oslo process to the 2000 Intifada, the emergence of Hamas as a leading force, the siege and now the massacre in Gaza. The Zionist State of permanent wars and terror has to be destroyed and the right of national self determination of the Palestinian people established. Only a democratic, secular and socialist republic bringing together Jew and Arab in the entire historic territory of Palestine will overcome the ordeal of the Palestinian people and put an end to the fortress-like life of the Jewish people of Israel. To present the Zionist state of Israel as the saviour of the Jewish people is an utter lie and to pretend that anti-Zionism equals anti-Semitism is sheer demagogy. On the contrary, Zionism is fuelling anti-Semitism all over the world and its crimes are used by the far right in Europe and elsewhere to cultivate hatred against Jews, in the current dangerous conditions of capitalist crisis. Anti-Zionist Jews all over the world, starting with the UEJF of France that organised a mass rally in Paris to condemn the Israeli assault and to display solidarity with the people of Gaza, have exposed this lie and demagoguery for what it is. Above all, the 10.000 strong anti-war demonstration of Israeli Jews in Tel Aviv during the current war in Gaza is a courageous and encouraging sign that opposition to the dominant Zionist madness is growing.

Hands off Gaza! Stop the Zionist terror unleashed on the people of Gaza! Israeli troops immediately out of the Gaza Strip!

All imperialist troops out of Iraq, the Middle East, and Afghanistan! UN forces out of Lebanon!

Down with the Zionist state! For a democratic, secular and socialist Republic bringing together Jew and Arab in the entire historic territory of Palestine!

For a Socialist Federation of the Middle East!

Friday, August 29, 2008

Imperialism out of the Caucasus, the Middle East, Afghanistan!


For a Socialist Federation of Caucasian peoples!

Down with capitalist restoration and bourgeois Bonapartism- for a new Union of Soviet Socialist Republics!

1. The five days war in Caucasus between the Georgian pro-imperialist Saakashvili regime and Russia has not solely a major regional and local importance but world significance.

There are obviously local and regional reasons that cannot be ignored: Georgia’s drive for a forced annexation of Abhazia and South Ossetia, de facto and willingly independent from 1992; the many centuries on-going conflict between Georgian nationalism and Great Russian chauvinism. But all these national problems have to be put in their actual historical context. Today’s international dimension overshadows and determines the other factors. The recent war in Caucasus is the latest -but not last- violent convulsion following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, one more link in the bloody series of imperialist wars in the post Cold War world, from Yugoslavia to Afghanistan and Iraq. The re-integration of the former Soviet space into world capitalism proved to be, far from a linear, peaceful process, the opening of an entire period of zigzag developments, full of sudden crises and imperialist wars, led mainly by US imperialism, to re-establish world hegemony under new historic terms.

After months of building up of tensions, the war in Caucasus started on August 7, with the invasion of South Ossetia by the Georgian troops, the barbaric destruction of its capital Tshkinvali, and mass killing of the civilian population who had to run away or hide in underground refuges; in a few hours, in the morning of August the 8th, the situation changed dramatically with the counter-offensive of the Russian armed forces that destroyed completely the Georgian army, navy and air-force, which were heavily armed and systematically trained by US imperialism and Israel, and then invaded Georgia, divided it into three parts, advanced 40 miles near the capital Tbilisi, surrounded it and cut it from the Black Sea. Saakashvili’s blitzkrieg did not succeed, as he hoped, to rapidly establish a fait accompli by annexing South Ossetia and then Abhazia, expecting that the immediate intervention of the “international community’ i.e. of US and EU imperialism could consolidate these gains; on the contrary, the adventurism of this Georgian-American lawyer acting both as a President of Georgia and as an agent provocateur of imperialism backfired and led to its crushing defeat as well as to a serious setback of his masters in Washington.

The EU imperialists, because of their dependence on Russian oil and natural gas, had to take a certain distance from the United States, tried, from a position of visible weakness and with a lot of hollow French rhetoric of the Sarkozy-Kouchner vulgar type, to “mediate” the crisis and advance their own interests in this strategic area.

The cease fire, declared before Sarkozy arrived in Moscow but later hurriedly agreed by the French and Russian Presidents Sarkozy and Medvedev, was presented by Condoleezza Rice in person to the Georgian puppet who could not but sign it. But neither the cease fire nor the anti-Russian hysteria that followed in the NATO ministerial meeting of August 19 and among the panicked pro-imperialist ruling elites in Eastern Europe can cancel the fact that their interests received a big blow and the configuration of forces has changed in the Eurasian region, and, thus, internationally.

Even the US intelligence, State and private agencies recognize the change post festum. Stratfor’s George Friedman writes on August 12, 2008: “The Russian invasion of Georgia has not changed the balance of power in Eurasia. It simply announced that the balance of power had already shifted. The United States has been absorbed in its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as potential conflict with Iran and a destabilizing situation in Pakistan. It has no strategic ground forces in reserve and is in no position to intervene on the Russian periphery” (The Russian Georgian War and the Balance of Power, 12/8/08, www. stratfor .com).

It is openly acknowledged by the defenders of US and world imperialism themselves that a serious setback took place for them. A new stage of international conflicts and explosions has been opened making evebn more chaotic the post Cold War New World Disorder.

2. Although the result of the war in Caucasus came as a surprise to US and world imperialism, the path to the war was opened and carefully prepared, in the previous years and months, with a series of imperialist actions, more and more aggressive, openly targeting the encirclement and suffocation of post-Soviet Russia.

Even in the 90s, when the US was supposedly on good terms with the Yeltsin administration and Strobe Talbott’s friendship policy was running high, the US strove to encircle Russia through a web of alliances in what is known as Russia’s “near abroad”. The establishment of the “Partnership for Peace” alliance, the waiting room for NATO, and the subsequent expansion of NATO to former Soviet republics and Eastern European countries up to the borders of Russia were only the most salient dimension.

GUUAM was the name given to the loose web of alliances that the US entertained with Russia’s southern and eastern neighbours, Georgia, the Ukraine, Uzbekistan (no longer part of the web), Azerbaijan and Moldova. The Afghanistan war, notwithstanding the rhetoric of the “war on terror”, was devised to penetrate former Soviet Central Asia, where thanks to the war the US established, for the first time in modern history for a Western power, military bases. Putin’s acquiesence to Bush’s post–9/11 policies with the aim of covering up his own dirty war in Chechnya was as stupid as Stalin’s reliance on the Molotof-Ribbentrop pact in order to protect the Soviet Union from Nazi aggression.

The encirclement of Russia by the establishment of a series of countries-members of NATO and of the EU in Eastern Europe and the Baltic has been combined by the manipulation of mass discontent leading mobilizations with a clear pro-Western imperialist and anti-Russian orientation, misnamed as “color revolutions”. The Saakashvili regime itself was established by the so-called pseudo “revolution of the Roses” against the Shevardnadze government, which was less pro-West. The same counterrevolutionary forces of imperialism, -NGOs like Otpor, CIA operators like the Greek-American Alex Rondos (adviser to George Papandreou, when the current leader of PASOK in Greece was Foreign Minister during the Kosovo War, then engineer of the “regime change” in Belgrade and adviser to Kostunica, and now, the last two years, leading adviser to…Saakashvili), were involved in Serbia, Georgia, and last but not least in the misnamed “Orange (counter) revolution” in Ukraine.

Saakashvili, the darling of the West, has also made Georgia into a Ghurka of US imperialism. After the withdrawal of troops from Iraq by some countries, Georgia was, until the Russian-Georgian war, the third country, after the US and the UK, in terms of troops on the ground A country with a population of less than 5 million, a country whose people are suffering from unemployment and poverty maintained two thousand troops in Iraq! As Saakashvili launched the invasion into South Ossetia, US air carriers managed to transfer back to Tbilisi the Georgian troops to participate into the aggression. It is not the defeat at Russian hands that should shame the Georgian people, but the fact that the country has acted as the hitman of US imperialism in Iraq and in Caucasus! The anti-popular character of this regime was clearly seen last year, when Saakashvili massacred the opposition in Georgia itself, in November 2007, months before massacring indiscriminately the innocent civilians in Tshkinvali.

The war in Caucasus that caused enormous sufferings to thousands of innocent people both in Ossetia and in Georgia, was a catastrophe announced in advance.

In 2008 there was an escalation of US actions menacing openly Russia: the unilateral declaration of “independence” of Kosovo and its transformation into a US protectorate militarily controlled by EU/NATO forces, not only did not take into consideration but it has dismissed with contempt Russia ’s insistence to keep intact the national borders established after World War II; then came the installation of the so-called “anti-missile system” in the Czech Republic extended now, in Poland; the US built up the pressure on NATO, against the reservations expressed by Germany and France and the uncompromising opposition of Russia, to accept as members Ukraine and Georgia; at the same time, with 130 military US advisers in Georgia, along with civilian advisers, hordes of contractors, military training facilities and bases etc. there is no doubt that this “independent” country, even before becoming officially a NATO member, worked as a protectorate and an advanced military base/CIA station of US imperialism in a most strategic area where the oil pipelines from Caucasus and Central Asia pass, very close to the heart of the Russian mainland.

3. The so-called “color” counter-revolutionary mobilizations in the former Soviet Republics came after it became clear that the US are in real trouble in Iraq. Now, the Saakashvili provocation comes when US policy in the Middle East and Central Asia failed to overcome its impasse. These regions are the soft underbelly of the former Soviet Union and at the borders of China, so they are interconnected in the over all strategic calculations of imperialism.

US ambitions regarding the oil and natural gas of the Caucasus and Central Asia in addition to that of the Middle East is the economic basis of this tug-of-war between the US and Russia. The US desires to deprive Russia of the benefits of these regional riches, a policy symbolised by the Baku- Tbilisi- Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline. The political basis of the struggle is the US effort to avoid the rise of rival powers in Asia, in particular Russia and China. The rush for oil and natural gas is itself a means for controlling the rise of these giants as a threat to US domination over Asia and, in the long run, the world.

As the world capitalist crisis is heading towards its climax, the strategic value of oil and natural gas producing areas (Middle East, Caucasus, Venezuela, Bolivia etc.) increases enormously- including the importance of pipelines such as BTC.

A “restructuring” of the US war strategy and its priorities is urgently needed after the fiasco of the neoconservative lunacy, a fact well realized by important circles of the American ruling class and reflected even in this year’s campaign for the US presidential elections. Saakashvili’s humiliating defeat revealed furthermore the flaws in current US strategy and the damages caused by a blind “fuite en avant”. Complacent due to the apparent inactivity of Russia after the declaration of Kosovo’s “independence”, they miscalculated, among other things, Russia’s reaction in Caucasus and its rebuilt military capability. Russia was considered to remain in shambles as in the ’90s.

Despite the enormous resources, the massive intelligence and high technology, a basic principle of military art –“Know your enemy!”-was ignored by the strategists of world imperialism leading them to the present setback. Their current anti-Russian hysteria and neo-Cold War rhetoric demonstrate only their disarray.

4. What is the historical and class nature of the war in Caucasus? This is the only way that the question is posed, first of all, by Marxism. Confusion in relation to that question dominates not solely the bourgeois analysts trapped in their ahistorical view but a great part of the international Left as well, including this part which still calls itself “Trotskyist”( before collapsing, some of them, into a vague ‘anti-capitalist’ reformist swamp).

Two viewpoints are predominant. First, an approach based solely, as previously in the case of the war on Yugoslavia, on the right of national self-determination raised into a metaphysical principle; the second view stresses, in one way or another, the abstract identity of the forces and regimes clashing over Caucasus.

A. The peoples of Abhazia and Ossetia have indeed legitimate national rights. Abhazia had a historical existence separate from that of Georgia for a long time, apart from a period in the Middle Ages (during the times of the “Golden Kingdom of Georgia”) and the years 1936-1992, when Lavrenti Beria exterminated the Abhazian national leaders and forcibly united this small country with Georgia. Ossetia was arbitrarily divided by Stalin into two parts, Northern and Southern, integrating the first into the Russian Federation and giving the second as “a gift” to his fatherland Georgia. The national problem of Georgia itself, its long oppression by Great Russian chauvinism under the Czars, was not solved but exacerbated by Stalin and Stalinism; its is not accidental that one of the major and last battles of Lenin before his death against the rising Soviet bureaucracy and Stalin himself was on the Georgian question. These are not solely issues for historians but unresolved historical contradictions to be resolved by the socialist revolution. When Stalinism collapsed in 1989-91, these unresolved problems re-emerged but in a new historical context and after a long experience living in Soviet times within a vast space where capital had been expropriated. The conditions under which the Soviet Union disintegrated fueled centrifugal forces and, at the same time, prevented a really independent national development of the former Soviet Republics; most of them were transformed into states and statelets ruled by a Mafia and looking for protection to a stronger neighbor or directly to imperialism.

. Only a socialist revolution without bureaucratic distortions can open a way out to the Caucasian peoples and their national rights, through a Socialist Federation of the Peoples of Caucasus.

B. To see the Russian-Georgian war over South Ossetia as one between a historically dominant big nation (the Russians) and a historically oppressed small nation (Georgia) is to misconceive its real import. It is equally wrong to see only an abstract identity between the contending parts over Caucasus taking a stand of equal distance reveals only political myopia and a pacifist reformist outlook.

A classical example of the pacifist attitude is the statement issued on August 12, 2008 by the French organization Ligue Communiste Révolutionnaire – LCR (which prepares its own liquidation as a Trotskyist organization into a ‘larger, New Anti-capitalist Party’). The statement has the pacifist title “Caucasus: The battles should stop immediately!”; it stresses the similarities between the Russian and the Georgian regimes (“both are ultranationalists, authoritarian and militarists”); it mentions the will of Georgia to defend its territorial integrity, and Russia’s will “to demonstrate to the US and the EU its coming back as an imperialist force of the first order”; it speaks vaguely, in an obvious understatement to say the least, about the “responsibilities of the Westerners” and their interests in this oil-rich strategic region; and it ends by a call equally pacifist as the headline of the Statement “ to build a movement of international solidarity among the peoples”.

But Western imperialism plays a role of a protagonist in the war over Caucasus and not of a bystander who tries only to take some advantage of the conflict of two semi-Asiatic “ultranationalist, authoritarian, militarist regimes” to advance their own interests. The internationalist duty of revolutionaries, particularly in Western imperialist countries such as France, is to speak loud and clear against the class “enemy in our own country” and call the workers for a fight to overthrow him.

The collapse of Stalinism and the open turn to capitalist restoration has opened the gates of the former Soviet space to the “Golden Horde” of international capital. Already in 1929, speaking about the possibility of a capitalist restoration in Russia following a counter-revolutionary overthrow of the October Revolution, Leon Trotsky had accurately predicted that a restored Russian capitalism would have a semi-colonial character under a Bonapartist political regime: “But what would Russian capitalism look like in its second edition? During the last fifteen years the map of the world has changed profoundly. The strong have grown immeasurably stronger, the weak incomparably weaker. The struggle for world domination has assumed titanic proportions. The phases of this struggle are played out upon the bones of the weak and backward nations. A capitalist Russia could not now occupy even the third –rate position to which czarist Russia was predestined by the course of the world war. Russian capitalism today would be dependent, semi-colonial capitalism without any prospects. Russia Number 2 would occupy a position somewhere between Russia Number 1 and India”.”(“Is Parliamentary Democracy Likely to Replace The Soviets?” February 25, 1929, Writings of Leon Trotsky 19129, Pathfinder 1975 p.55).

It is historically false to call Russia a “new imperialism” in conflict now in Caucasus with other old imperialisms. Imperialism is not just a militarist expansionist policy, in the vulgar bourgeois acceptance of the term, but a historical epoch of capitalist development, the highest and last stage of capitalism, as Lenin had said. Did the ruling elite in Russia manage in the last 17 years not only to overcome the problems of transition to capitalism but to advance this capitalism to its highest stage against all the dominant tendencies of our epoch of capitalist decline and imperialist decay?

Developments after 1991 gave justification to Trotsky’s prediction: not only the old USSR disintegrated but Russia itself, its heartland, started rapidly to disintegrate and fall as a trophy to competing Western capitalist predators. Transition back to capitalism came in a belated phase of imperialist decline and crisis of world capitalism. It was that affected by all the illness of the decaying world social system into which the restorationist forces wanted to integrate Russia. The restoration process, started with the IMF “shock therapy” and the biggest theft of public property in History, produced a Mafia- State bureaucracy corruption complex of nouveaux riches, as well as enormous disasters in production and the living standards of the masses. But the contradictions of a transition in crisis were not resolved and the failure of the first stage of restoration was ignited by the explosion of a world capitalist crisis. The international financial maelstrom of 1997, centered in the Asia-Pacific region, precipitated the default of Russia in August 1998 and terminated the Yeltsin comprador regime. Putin’s Bonapartism emerged to stop the falling apart of the country by re-nationalizing key sectors of the economy, attacking by the power of the “siloviki” (the FSB-former KGB) the power of the oligarchs, who were transforming the country into a semi-colony producing raw materials for the West, and using the surplus from the enormous increase of income that the rise of the price of oil and natural gas in the period 2000-2008 had provided to strengthen the State. The growth of the State came as a product of, as well as a resistance to, the disintegrating effects of the unresolved internal contradictions and of the growing pressures of a world capitalist environment facing the first signs of exhaustion of finance globalization. Putin has called the dissolution of the Soviet Union ‘a geopolitical disaster’ but at the same time, he stressed that he opposes a return to the Soviet State. The new “patriotic” Russian Bonapartism tries to secure through State control the transition to capitalism, overcoming the previous failure of the liberals. That creates a new irresolvable contradiction: from the one side, the post Soviet Russian State, that Putin’s Bonapartism wants to strengthen against disintegration, promotes and defends capitalist relations of production- from this standpoint, the former workers’ State had become a bourgeois State but without a stable capitalist social base; from the other side, these same capitalist tendencies in their growth inescapably strengthen the disintegration forces. In a certain point of historical development, particularly if a world depression leads to a fall of the oil prices and a depletion of the State resources mobilized for its survival and defense, this Bonapartism, as an obstacle to historical progress, will fall either under the pressures of world imperialism or by a second October socialist revolution.

In Caucasus a war by proxy is waged by imperialism against Putin’s Bonapartist Russia. As in the dawn of capitalism, a war of Reconquista in the Iberian Peninsula prepared the ground for the emergence of a new world social system, now in the epoch of historical decline of this outmoded system, world capitalism, a new cycle of wars of Reconquista of the vast space where capital had been expropriated after 1917 has been opened.

The tactical victory of the Russian Army has undoubtedly strengthened the Bonapartist -restorationist regime in Moscow. A political regime is interconnected with the underlying economic process that it promotes and defends; but the political cannot be reduced to the economic(and vice versa, the economic cannot be substituted by the political): the strengthening of a political restorationist regime does not mean automatically the resolution of the contradictions of the economic process of capitalist restoration that it advances. In some cases, such as probably of Putin’s, the contradiction between an apparently strong political regime and its socially unstable economic base ridden by contradictions could become sharper, and a source of unexpected explosions.

Putin’s Bonapartism, dedicated as it is to advance the capitalist transformation of Russia, is not an instrument of struggle against imperialism, but its accomplice. The proposal by Moscow for a joint NATO/ Russian meeting to resolve the crisis in Caucasus and its continuing help given to US/NATO imperialism in Afghanistan show the role of the “patriots” in Kremlin... Only a Second October socialist Revolution led by the working class and its Party, on a genuine Marxist revolutionary program and an internationalist perspective can save Russia from dismemberment and colonization by imperialism, defeating all aggressions, provocations, encirclement etc. and overthrowing, as well all the clans of “siloviki”, corrupt “Noviy Russki” nouveaux riches, oligarchs, compradors of world capital and restorationist of all kinds, the real Fifth Column of Yankee imperialism and NATO.

5. The Balkan Socialist Center “Christian Rakovsky” calls to the working and oppressed masses in the Balkans, in the Caucasus, in Russia, in Europe, in the entire region and internationally to mobilize against imperialism’s wars and create conditions to overthrow the regimes and the system that generates wars, social disaster and destitution of the peoples.

US/ EU/ NATO imperialism out from [out of] Caucasus, the Middle East and Afghanistan!

For a Socialist Federation of Caucasian peoples!

Down with capitalist restoration and bourgeois Bonapartism- for a new socialist revolution to rebuild a new Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on new socialist, anti-bureaucratic, and internationalist bases!

The Balkan Socialist Center “Christian Rakovsky”

August 24, 2008

Friday, August 1, 2008

Nationalists give Radovan Karadzic to imperialism


Statement by the Balkan Socialist Federation “Christian Rakovsky”


Nationalists give Radovan Karadzic to imperialism

Imperialism has nothing to boast about the “capture” of Radovan Karadzic in Belgrade, Serbia, on July 21, 2008: the Bosnian Serb nationalist leader, formerly a protégé by the late Slobodan Milosevic, was cynically given to European and American imperialism and their ‘International Court’ in Hague by the nationalists of Milosevic’s Socialist Party itself.
Karadzic was a fugitive from 1995, when the “International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia” (ICTY) in Hague, first has raised charges against him for “genocide”. In 1996, immediately after the imperialist imposed Dayton agreement that ended the war in Bosnia by transforming it into a NATO occupied protectorate, he was compelled to leave his post as a head of the Bosnian Serb entity. He was accused for “crimes against humanity” in Bosnia by the NATO “humanitarians” that have destroyed Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan the last decade; together with the Serbian General Ratko Mladic, still in liberty, Karadzic is, particularly, considered as a main responsible for the horrible massacre of Bosnian Muslims civilians in Srebrenica, during the bloody wars that dismembered former Yugoslavia in the ’90s.
The last 13 years Karadzic was hiding, probably with the help of the Serbian security services controlled by supporters of the late nationalist Stalinist leader Slobodan Milosevic and his Party. Three weeks before the arrest, a new coalition government was formed in Belgrade, whose main partners are the openly pro-imperialist Democratic Party of the President Tadic and the Socialist Party led by Ivica Dacic, successor of Milosevic. Dacic became deputy prime minister and head of the crucial Ministry of Interior, controlling the police forces. Less a month after Dacic’s nomination, Karadzic miraculously was “found” and arrested in Serbia’s capital. It is obvious that the ‘sudden’ arrest was a part of a deal between the nationalists of the Milosevic’s party and imperialism, sealing their new pact of collaboration on the ruins of former Yugoslavia.
The European Union and the United States immediately hailed this new development as opening the road for Serbia to join the Union of European capitalist bandits. Dora Bakoyanis, the current foreign minister of the Karamanlis government in Greece, was particularly enthusiastic with the capture of Karadzic, forgetting that her father, Konstantinos Mitsotakis, former right wing Prime Minister in early ’90s, was close friend and protector of the Serb Bosnian nationalist leader. (For the Greek people, anyway, the attitude of the daughter of Mitsotakis comes as no surprise; it is well known that the Mitsotakis family has a long tradition of double dealing and treachery, going back at least to the events of 1965 leading to the 1967 military dictatorship).
But George A. Papandreou also, the leader of the Official Opposition “socialist” party PASOK and chairman re-elect of the Socialist International, was more than enthusiastic with these events; he himself was very instrumental to seal the alliance between Tadic’s party and Milosevic’s party during the recent meeting of the Socialist International in Greece- a vital step to overcome the impasse after the ambiguous results of the last elections in Serbia, and the crisis of governance; above all, the formation of this alliance was the necessary precondition to establish in Belgrade a government totally subservient to Western imperialist interests.
Washington, London, Paris, Brussels and Athens combined their efforts and pressures and temporarily have succeeded to have another puppet regime in this Archipelago of imperialist protectorates, in which former Yugoslavia has collapsed. By giving the head of Karadzic to the Court in Hague, the Democratic Party/Socialist Party coalition government presents its credentials not to the Serbian people but to their masters in Brussels and Washington.
The pompously misnamed “International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia” badly needed such a development. Its legitimacy is strongly challenged and its failures are obvious to all to see: the prime accused Slobodan Milosevic died in custody under mysterious conditions; his former collaborator and one of the main witnesses against Milosevic, Milan Babic, committed suicide in custody; the trial of the ultranationalist Serbian Radical Party leader Vojislav Seselj has turned into a circus; the acquittals of the Bosniak military commander Naser Oric and of the UCK commander, the Kosovar Ramush Haradinaj have made the persecution a laughing stock; the release on July 18, 2008 of the first convict of the Tribunal, the unrepentant low-ranking soldier Dusan (Dusko) Tadic, made even worst this legitimacy crisis. Now, the imperialists behind The Hague Court hope that a trial of Karadzic will help to re-invigorate their discredited institution and its main mission: to cover up for the worst criminals, the architects of Yugoslavia’s tragedy, namely the EU and US imperialisms.
Karadzic himself, as well as other leading members of the nationalist cliques, is part of the counter-revolutionary process that dismembered Yugoslavia. But his role and eventually his crimes have to be judged by the popular masses of former Yugoslavia, not by their butchers in the West.
It is clearly demonstrated that nationalism promoted by the bureaucratic elites, so instrumental for the destruction of the gains of the Yugoslav Socialist Revolution, has completely capitulated now in front of imperialism to become its faithful watchdog. It is not the first time: from the times of the Chetnik nationalists of Draza Mikhailovic during the Nazi Occupation to the Dayton Agreement under Slobodan Milosevic, Balkan nationalism in every form has proven to be a dangerous and treacherous enemy of its own people, and of all Balkan peoples. Now it was not so difficult for them to ‘sacrifice’ an icon of Serbian nationalism for their elite interests.
Serbian economy is in ruins after years of devastation, wars, isolation and pressures by the West. Their ruling cliques cannot survive any more by balancing between Russia and EU; they see as their only way out integration to the EU. This is the reason and hope behind nationalism’s surrender.
This hope is vain. The capitalist world, including and particularly the EU, is plunging in the “worst crisis from 1929”, as the leading spokesmen for capitalism now admit. The EU extension in the East and its economic burden coincides and interacts with the ongoing world crisis, undermining capitalist restoration and stabilization plans in the former “socialist countries” in the Balkans, Eastern Europe, and Russia.
The working class and the oppressed masses in former Yugoslavia and in the Balkans need now more than ever to unite and fight for a way out from the crisis. Nationalism has betrayed, and now it is giving up even its own leaders. Internationalism and Socialism is the only way forward. This is the road that the Balkan Socialist Centre “Christian Rakovsky”, despite all difficulties, fights to open for all the oppressed and fighters in our region.
Down with EU and US imperialism! For a Balkan Socialist Federation of free and independent peoples!

July 25, 2008


Workers Revolutionary Party -Greece

Initiative for the Workers Revolutionary Party - Turkey

Nuclear Marx - Roumaine

Militants for the 4th international - Palestine

RPK -Russia

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Statement of the Balkan Socialist Centre “Christian Rakovsky”



Statement of the Balkan Socialist Centre “Christian Rakovsky”

No to the US/EU imperialists’ operation of a fake “independence” of Kosovo!

Yes to the right of national self-determination of all the Balkan peoples!

For a Socialist Federation of the Balkans!


The declaration of the “independence” of Kosovo has nothing to do with the legitimate national rights of an oppressed people or a national minority. It is, first and foremost, an act of a new imperialist intervention in the Balkans, the creation of a US protectorate under EU military control. It is also a step forward for one of the pet projects of the US in the Balkans after the 1999 NATO war: the establishment of another Albanian statelet side by side with Albania itself leads to their future unification in a “Greater Albania” absorbing the Albanian populations in neighbouring countries, first of all of Macedonia. US imperialism, as the Italian fascists did during the Second World War, wants to manipulate Albanian nationalism for its own interests and strategic plans in the region against the peoples of the Balkans, including the Albanian people.

This fact is so tangible, so concrete that when Martti Ahtisaari, the Special Envoy of the United Nations (UN), in a report he submitted in spring 2007 after two years of negotiations between Kosovo and Serbia had reached a deadlock, recommended the “independence” of Kosovo, he had to qualify this by a special formula, “supervised independence”.. Hence, the “independence” of Kosovo is openly sham independence.

And who is supposed to “supervise” the “independence” of Kosovo? The answer to this question gives us the second dimension of Kosovo's “independence”. It is a well-known fact that, after the seventy four-day air strikes inflicted on the former Yugoslavia by NATO, Kosovo was delivered to the civilian rule of UNMIK (the UN Kosovo Mission) and the military control of KFOR (the Kosovo Peace Force). According to the terms of the resolution adopted by the UN after the termination of the Kosovo War, Kosovo was to remain Serbian territory, but was also to be converted into a “UN protectorate”. This was a legal formula that was permeated with contradiction, since the status of “protectorate” is an entirely colonial status and to declare a territory that is under the sovereignty of an independent state (the former Yugoslavia and today's successor state of Serbia) a colonial belonging defies logic. The “independence” granted today to Kosovo removes this contradiction, making it thereby a straightforward colony, one under multilateral rule. The initiative regarding the declaration of “independence” does not belong to Hashim Thaci, the leader of the so-called Kosovo Liberation Army become prime minister in January this year, but Ahtisaari on behalf of the UN. It is a travesty to pretend that Thaci is a “hero”. Imperialism has offered “independence” to the KLA on a golden platter. Today Kosovo is controlled by 17 thousand NATO troops. It is being delivered to the rule of the EU, which will be sending an additional force of 1800 to police the territory. “Independence” on the force of arms of others is sham independence!

The 1999 NATO/US/EU war against former Yugoslavia was fought on the declared grounds of stopping the cruel treatment and ethnic cleansing the Albanians of Kosovo were suffering at the hands of Milosevic. But the final outcome nine years later demonstrates that the real aim was to carry to its conclusion the dismemberment of Yugoslavia. “Operation independence Kosovo” is but the belated consummation of the forcible destruction of Yugoslavia in the years 1991 to 1999.

A clear understanding regarding the aims of this imperialistic policy is of paramount importance. To start with, the Balkans are the South-western tip of Eurasia, an immense region that has come up for grabs as a result of the collapse of the Soviet Union and the other degenerated workers' states in Europe between 1989 and 1992. It was imperative for imperialism to prevent the survival of a state (Federal Yugoslavia) that had the capacity of obstructing imperialist plans in the Balkans. The dismemberment of Yugoslavia was the most violent form that capitalist restoration took in this historical period. Secondly, for the smooth implementation of EU’s and Germany’s plans to annex central and Eastern Europe, it was necessary to carve Federal Yugoslavia into mini-states and subsequently to destroy the historically strong identity of the Balkans through the imposition of the concept of “Southeast Europe”. Third, the Albanians were promoted and manipulated as a “special ally” of the US. Albania has today become the stronghold of reaction and pro-imperialist policies, as well as the Balkan centre of trafficking in drugs and prostitution. The project of “Greater Albania” is a US initiative, developed as a counterweight to the preponderance of the Southern Slavs in the Balkans and particularly as a barrier to Russia’s role in this strategic region connecting the oilfields from the Middle East, Caucasus and Central Asia to Europe. Today Albania and Kosovo seem to embody the two heads of the eagle on the Albanian flag. Tomorrow, the eagle may become triple-headed, with the Albanians of Macedonia joining the band wagon. The “independence” of Kosovo should be situated in this overall picture.

Another significant aspect is to threaten the many states in the region with strong minorities by the prospect of demands for independence. The “solution” would be an imperialist consensus against the peoples, in a Holy Alliance, as after 1815. And, connected to this aspect, one must underline the nationalistic messages developed by layers of the present ruling restorationist elites in the countries formerly under a Stalinist bureaucratic rule: these messages, directed against the conscience of the unity of the working people, constitute the response to the aggravation of the social, economic, political crises of these countries and the world.

The Albanians of Kosovo seem to be overwhelmingly in favour of secession from Serbia. Would it not be appropriate under these circumstances, it might be asked, for internationalists to support this “independence” on the basis of the right of nations to self-determination? The status accorded to Kosovo today has nothing to do with “independence” and hence with self-determination. A new colony is born. How long the status of protectorate will last is totally unforeseeable, given the policy of imperialism in the Balkans.

That Turkey should have recognised the “independence” of Kosovo immediately, on the same day as the US and the larger states of the EU, and this despite its own Kurdish question and its fears regarding the Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq, has certainly nothing to do with respect for the rights of oppressed nations. The ruling classes of Turkey have made it a principle to serve the policies of imperialism and of US imperialism in particular, in the region of Eurasia, as long as these do not come into direct conflict with its own interests as in the case of the Kurdish question. The Eurasia policy of Turkey, pursued since Özal established it in 1991, has taken the form of military support to all kinds of imperialist endeavours (Somali, Afghanistan, Lebanon etc.). During the Kosovo War, Turkish bombers poured death over the Serbian people arm in arm with the air forces of imperialist powers, three military air strips were allocated to imperialist fighter jets (but were not ultimately used because the war ended earlier than predicted), and the supposedly nationalist prime minister Ecevit declared, in the early stages of the war, that Turkey was prepared for land combat. The recognition of the “independence” of Kosovo implies that Turkey continues to play the game of imperialism and is directly connected to the agreement of 5 November 2007 between Bush and Erdogan related to the bombing of Kurdish (PKK) targets in Northern Iraq. Given the oppression of the Serbs by the Turks and the role they played under the Ottoman Empire in the forcible Islamisation of Kosovo, this policy becomes all the more shameless.

The capitalist government of Greece temporarily did not recognize the “independence” of Kosovo- where Greek troops are also stationed as a part of the actual occupation of the country by imperialism after 1999- solely to bargain with the US a solution of the so-called problem of the “name of Macedonia” in favour to the interests of Greek capitalism as a regional economic hegemon.

All the ruling classes and restorationist regimes in the Balkans are closely collaborating with imperialism in its plans to re-colonize the region and impose a New imperialist Order in the post-Cold War chaotic world. Nationalism and chauvinism, reactionary dreams for a “Greater Albania”, or a “Greater Serbia”, or a “Greater Romania” or a “Greater Greece” or for a “neo-ottoman Empire” etc are tools at the hands of the imperialist Great Powers. It is also a dangerous illusion, nurtured especially by Serbian and Greek nationalists, that the Putin restorationist regime and Great Russian nationalism could help the Balkan peoples against imperialism. Only the workers and peasants, the oppressed popular masses can and should unite in a common struggle against all the oppressors, the Great Powers as well as against the local pro-imperialist nationalistic cliques, for social and national emancipation, for Socialism.

The danger for a new round of massacres re-emerges. Urgent action to stop new wars and imperialist barbarism is needed by the working class and all the oppressed popular masses; to open the road for a Balkan Peninsula which belongs to its free and independent peoples united to build their socialist future without imperialist oppression and capitalist exploitation.

Withdraw the decision to recognise the independence of Kosovo!

For the right of national self-determination without any imperialist interference!

Turkey, Greece, and all Balkan countries out of NATO!

Pull all imperialist troops and military bases out of the Balkans!

For a Socialist Federation of the Balkans!

25 February 2008

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Publications of Balkan Socialist Center

The circle of October has not be closed
special edition

November 2007




click here to read this brochure

Challenges in Balkans , Middle East and Russia
(5th international conference September 16-18 ,2005)



click here to read this brochure